Tag Archives: northern-voice

What I learned at Northern Voice – the 2011 edition

…is cancelled. Not going to happen. I thought I was going to break blog-silence for it (and apparently I am, but only to say I can’t and won’t write it.) Make of that what you will. I expect that was my last Northern Voice. 7 years was a pretty good run. But feels like it’s time to move on.

One thing I do want to make clear though, is that none of this has anything to do with the conference itself or the organizers; anyone running a conference would do well to take lessons from these folks. The attention to detail, the atmosphere they have helped create, the community they have helped foster – all of it deserves nothing but applause and thanks. If you have never attended and you are in the Pacific Northwest, do yourself a favour, if they run it again next year, make the trip. It is a different kind of conference. – SWL

Northern Voice '10: Embodiment, Boundaries, Rhizomes & several small furry bloggers gathered together in a cave grooving with a giant

Those of you who have been lucky enough to join us for a Northern Voice conference over the last 6 years know what a transformative event it can be, and those who haven’t have likely heard enough of us prattle on to that effect to either want to come or want us to shut up. This year did not disappoint. Indeed, with the exception of the absence of He Who Shall Not Be Named, it was a near perfect event, combining friends old and new, learning and working together and some ‘far out’ moments. This is my effort to stitch together my gleanings from the last 5 days. It is not a chronological accounting, though it does hopefully tell a story.

Abstraction, Embeddedness, Critique, Analysis and Discourse

I have been reading Jaron Lanier’s “You are not a Gadget” over the past 2 weeks with great gusto. It is a wonderful humanist critique of the de-humanizing dangers of Web 2.0 by someone with hard-core technological cred. It is not scaremongering, and it is not reductive, but a subtle reading by someone who truly gets what we do when we “program” something. It resonates with me because my technophilia and post-modernist tendencies have always been tempered with heavy doses of humanism. A tricky balance indeed.

I don’t want to put words into Jon Beasley-Murray’s mouth, but I felt like his talk (which was slotted in my mind quite nicely along with @davecormier’s) had a similar feel; I took it not as a condemnation of all things network, open or technological, but as a caution against naive technological utopianism and an urging to situate our analyses within the multiple dimensions that “technology” “knowledge” “the University” etc. exist. This caused me to reference (and indeed come to understand even more deeply than I had) the term “Power/Knowledge” which many will know from Foucault. And he’s right – if we don’t actively engage this, either someone else will (quite possibly someone of an unpalatable political bent) or changes will take place that needlessly disrupt aspects of our society we’ll wish hadn’t vanished. Simply wishing won’t make it so.

In both of these and a number of other interactions throughout the 4 days, I came to see the “embedded” (or “embodied” – I know it’s different but it comes up later too) nature of knowledge, institutions, communities, and that analysis that tries to reduce them to just one or a few key variables is, well, reductive. To which some will simply reply “duh!” But we do not *have* to settle for that (and herein lies my complaint of the larger “naive empiricism” approach, though not a claim that every empiricist is naive). Part of “not settling” is realizing it’s not a finite conversation but an ongoing one, always already ongoing, that we join in, it proceeds us, will carry on after us, and yet *doesn’t happen without us.* Part of “not settling” is developing new ways of understanding/inhabiting complex contexts that work with multiple dimensions/variables/polarities at once.

“Healthy” Communities, Boundaries, Adjacencies and Non-reductive Analysis

Now before you start your chorus of “Kumbaya,” let me tell you about an analyses/process that I think does just that. On my way over a day before Northern Voice to a gathering of Online Community Enthusiasts, I was re-reading the new book “Digital Habitats: stewarding technology for community” by Etienne Wenger, John D. Smith, and that most chocolatey goddess of the chalk drawing, Nancy White. I cannot recommend it highly enough to you – if you work with communities, if you work in online learning, or even if you are simple interested in the practice of technology assessment, this is for me a groundbreaking work.

Sculpture by Adam May, "Mother and Child" Botanic Gardens, DublinRecall – I spent 7 years working on Edutools, a site that allowed people to perform a features-based side-by-side comparison of Learning Management Systems. So I have struggled with the question of how to help people make technology choice in a “rational” way, a way “that scales” (by definition, reductive). As I read this new book, which describes a process of community self-identification of “orientations” that can then help guide (but not determine) the choice of specific tools, features or platforms (a seemingly obvious yet often overlooked distinction made in the book as well), it was like the scales fell from my eyes. One can argue with the number of “orientations” or the specific ones (though these are borne out of these three wise people’s long experience working with actual communities.) But the approach strongly resists a de-contextualized, one size fits all approach in favour of one that starts from the primary importance of specific, not abstract, context. (And note to Nancy – I will never stop apologizing for using the term “community in a box” and see how, not only being wrong and offensive, it is deeply mis-leading and underlies the whole approach I’m decrying here. Forgive me, please!). Does it scale? MU! Ask the question again.

During a break on the Thursday I took the chance to ask Nancy a question – “What is a ‘healthy’ community?” In looking at these various orientations it struck me that there must be recognizable ‘patterns,’ say, of a “successful open source community,” that could help us recognize others when we see them. This is exactly right and exactly wrong; as Nancy helped me understand, exactly wrong because it locates the notion of health in some abstract standard outside the community, when the notion of health being put out here is about internal coherence and accord – is the community becoming (or at least striving to be) what it wants to be.

Before we fall headlong into absolute relativism, I think for the “exactly right” (more like “kind of right”) part of the above, the reason we can use the words “community” or “healthy” *at all*, we need to look towards Wittgenstein’s notion “family resemblance” – we can recognize them as “healthy” because of many overlaps, not one single one, and we recognizers can do so precisely because of our embeddedness in the practices of looking at these things.

Which explains, for me at least, why I was reluctant to comment on the “success” of #altmoosecamp other than to say “well it seemed to go ok, lots of people showed up and shared which was *my* hope for it.” I am a part of that community. According to Dave Cormier, I “stopped acting like a hippy and stepped up” by helping to organize it, take a “leadership” role, but it was (I think a new term Dave and I coined on the walk to dinner that night) “rhizomatic leadership” – leadership that isn’t afraid to inherit a model or to lead in a way that helps others similarly copy from it, learn from it, or indeed insert themselves into it (like @nancywhite exhibited so superbly when, after seeing me lament “oh how is poor old *me* supposed to organize the schedule for #altmoosecamp without being all sorts of dictatorial” she simply placed her name beside a time slot – uh, duh, Scott, build an empty schedule and then invite *the community* to chose and discuss their slots. Lead by creating space for others, not by doing it for them. #slowlearner).

“Rhizomatic” came up a lot this weekend (and not just because Dave Cormier was there.) Indeed if I had to pick a “theme” for the conference, it would be “Rhizomatic” (though I am still struggling through the metaphor – I think I now “get” it, just not sure it properly reflects the permeable “entities” that “family resemblance” is getting at above.) Perhaps it was just that I was listening with these ears (perhaps? ha!) but the solutions I was seeing that really turned me on, and they were everywhere, were “rhizomatic” – authentic, lived in, organically grown, and done in such a way that as long as a seed gets carried by the wind somewhere “else,” a “new” rhizome can start – a different one? yes. ex nihilo? no. The medium IS the message, or impacts the message because the message should not, can not, be abstracted out of it. Not only do you not need 1 million people consuming the same single source, the uniform audience, the “mass,” (even if you could get this to happen anymore in our rapidly fragmenting world,) but we should not aim for it. Aim instead for 100 people, all of whom, precisely in part because of the intimacy of the connection, will in turn aim at a 100 people. Aim your message as a form of rhizomatic leadership, a message that leaves space for others. Not just with words. With actions. Kurt, you might have felt “stupid and contagious” but I don’t and won’t wait around for anyone to “entertain us.” And I know a hell of a lot of people who feel the same way.

This post is getting ridiculously long, and I doubt anyone is still reading it (really? thanks for sticking with it), so one last point before the finale. During the Online Community Enthusiasts gathering on Thursday we spent the afternoon doing a session on “Boundaries” led by Alice MacGillvary. I only “kindof” got it during the day; it took the rest of the weekend for it to fully percolate through how profoundly this topic of boundaries is to all of this work and thinking on networks, learning and communities. It relates to the above topic of “family resemblance” – the ability to recognize something without having to reify it as *only* that thing, that set of limited values. And it relates to Northern Voice as a whole, a “social media” conference (how much more nebulous can you get), the value of which is often in the intermixing of communities, disciplines, practices, the crossing of boundaries. This came up again in the #altmoosecamp session led (surprise surprise) by Nancy White (really, I’m a fanboy but not a rabid one, promise!) and was captured in the wonderful expression “Unexpected Adjacencies.” One follow up I hope to do (and others hopefully will join in) is to share those outliers, those “unexpected adjacencies” from our RSS readers, those people who inform our practice, inform our personhood, but who are not immediate peers, who come from some different discipline or practice. It can only make us richer.

…and several small furry bloggers gathered together in a cave grooving with a giant

Huh? Well, how else to describe an event that capped off all the above richness with two tremendous gatherings at Casa Lamb y Mcphee with some of the people I love most in the world, taking our thinking and bonds even further in a 100 mini-jams throughout the evening, even managing to invoke the spectres of those who couldn’t be there. The EduGlu singers were most DEFINITELY in the house.

And “The Giant?” Well, none other than Bryan Alexander – a “giant” to me, someone I have hoped to meet for a long time, and who did not disappoint. His keynote was funny and insightful, managing to cross the uncanny valley of academia and social media denizens, and his presence (which, sadly, I did not get enough time to spend in) warm, smart, funny. It is amazingly gratifying those times you get to meet your intellectual pacesetters and they turn out to be all you’d hoped for (Bryan – should I have left the title intact and referred to you as a “Pict?” Wasn’t sure – not everyone takes well to being referred to as a “Pict” ;-)

The End

Anyways, if you made it this far, please leave a comment, if only to let me know someone read all this (and I may even create a new Nessie Award for “Reader who persisted the furthest through one of my overwordy posts” in your honour!) Hats off to all of the Northern Voice organizers – you have done a great service not just to Vancouver but to far further flung reaches in helping to foster community and lead rhizomatically. Here’s to many more to come. Northern Voice is Dead. Long Live Northern Voice.

WordPress for Education Camp – Vancouver version

http://wordcampedvancouver.pbwiki.com/

Just wanted to put a shout out here to any educational technologist and educators in BC who are using WordPress (or WordPress MultiUser) in support of the educational practices, simple content publishing or resource sharing… If you hadn’t heard yet, on Thursday, February 19, 2009 (start time not announced yet, but we’re a fairly civilized bunch, so it won’t be *too* early I hope) a FREE ‘camp‘ for using WordPress in education is happening out at the UBC main campus.

The event is being held to coincide with the fantastic Northern Voice conference. The Northern Voice conference, while not free (WordcampEd IS, though), is very reasonable ($60 for the two days) and so if you were thnking of travelling to the mainland for it, sign up soon, as it is filling up fast, but also consider coming a day early and spending the day with us working on some wordpress in education challenges.

If you have never been to a camp/unconference before, I HIGHLY recommend it. Just make sure to bring your ideas, your laptop and your gumption! And please, dive into the wiki that D’Arcy has set up; the whole idea behind an unconference like this is that it will be what we make of it. Yes, there will be some pretty decent wordpress hackers thee, but there will also be those, like me, who continually fumble with it and are just as interested in *what* you can do as in how. So don’t be shy!

(And just to be clear – this shout out isn’t meant to *exclude* anyone outside of BC. Far from it; if you care enough to travel from afar, we’d LOVE to have you. Just trying to reach out to people in my particular region.) – SWL

What this slow learner learned at Northern Voice – The 2008 Edition

I am not certain enough time has passed yet to have fully digested the last few days (heck I haven’t even left Vancouver and still get one more culinary delight before I go in the form of Dim Sum with the crew). (Sheesh this post has taken a while to write and it is still rushed and not very clear…) This year was different than last; the learning was more in the form of themes that emerged from numerous conversations rather than thunderous emotional epiphany. Anyways, here it goes, what (I hope) I learned this year at Northern Voice:

The Importance of Stories and Narrative

I am a former English major. So I will forgive you if you ignore me from here on out as a perennial dimwit when I tell you that it took me this long to ‘get’ how crucial narrative and storytelling are to everything we are doing, be it learning online, connecting, weaving one’s online presence, blogging… From cogdog‘s masterful 50 Ways performance, to Nancy White’s drawing party, from seeing the WordPress hotshots demonstrate the myriad ways it can be used to tell different stories, to a comment from Keira that “living online is like being in a movie,” to my own little story of blog love that dared speak its name, at each step there seemed to be another story, or someone urging me to re-approach all my convoluted configurations through the simpler (and as some convincingly argued, innate) frame of “storytelling.” Like I said, slow learner.

People deserve simple tools that give them control and choice

Another important theme that emerged for me is that it’s not the specific tool itself that is critical but instead the motivation to use the tool, the problem that is trying to be solved, the itch scratched, that largely determines success or failure. Human instrumentality is such that we will find a way to connect, to work, to change, even if it means using smoke signals or rocks to do the trick.
Sure, ‘bad’ tools get in the way of motivated people, and ‘good’ tools help them work even better. But when people are motivated to connect, to collaborate, to communicate, to learn, they will find a way, make the tools at hand bend to their purpose.

Our job, then, as tool makers is in part to make tools that they can bend to their needs, that are useful because of the uses they can be put to and not only because of the intentions of their designer. Twitter is a great example of this that came up time and again. The many disguises that WordPress can wear another.

But place this alongside Brian‘s usability demonstration of checking discussion threads in WebCT (25 clicks that told a 1000 words), that usability, simpleness, is not a simply a “nice to have.” I wish we had video of it. Instead I would just urge all campus decision makers be forced to monitor a discussion thread in a CMS, like their instructors have to do, for a few weeks. I think we could get the revolution started overnight this way.

The welcoming heart

Now that I think of it, I guess there is some commonality with the revelations of last year. Last year I had my heart opened to the impactful, authentic ways in which people were using blogs, in strong contrast to the often intellectual exercise they can be for me. This year it was my assumptions on the social/network skills and fluency that I require people to bring to participate in the form of connected, networked learning and community that were challenged and hopefully opened my heart a bit more.

It happened a few times, but the most notable was during the “Blogging is Dead – Long Live Bloggers” when (I will blame it on my somewhat addled Saturday morning state) I made some obnoxious assertions about online identity that were really exclusionary. I didn’t mean them that way, but they were.

Yet as the Reverend Jim helped remind me later that day “People call me on my bullshit…and I like it.” I got a bit defensive in the session when it was called to my attention, but because of one of the people doing the calling (and her inimitable, gentle way of doing so), I tried to hear past my defensiveness. And I came to see that while one can be ‘open’ and available on the web with one’s writing & one’s work, that is different than being open and having a ‘welcoming heart.’ That is, a (I’m struggling for a word here – stance? posture? feeling? revealing?) well, an “open heart” that welcomes those you come across, who come across you, instead of an egoful one always needing to be regarded. I don’t think I am expressing this well. Maybe that simply belies that I have not learnt it well yet. Like I said, slow learner.

There’s more. So much more. But I can’t get it out of me right now. (Plus I’m off for a hike with the cogdog, so that struggle will have to wait). But like others, I did not come away from NV unchallenged or (hopefully) unchanged. – SWL

OPML file of all Northern Voice attendee blogs

http://wiki.northernvoice.ca/f/nv-feeds-subscriptions.xml

I hate technorati. It doesn’t freakin’ work. And this year, for whatever reasons, there seems to be a reluctance to provide a “Planet Northern Voice” aggregator like in past years. So my solutions was to cull all of the “blog” feed URLs from the attendees pages. I’m using this directly in my Google reading – I had not realized that Google Readers let’s you constrain your search to a folder of feeds, so by simply searching on “Northern Voice” in this folder of feeds, I’ve got my own aggregator of just NV posts that in my opinion provides way more depth of coverage than technorati (and without all the cruft of the Jaiku feed someone put together which includes all the flickr and twitter feeds as well). Hope it is of help – you are of course free to use it yourself and add  other feeds if you feel it isn’t comprehensive enough. – SWL