Just got back from UVic where I gave a talk to a small group from the Electronic Textual Cultures Laboratory. I was going to write a longer post than this, trying to situate my talk somewhere between the binaries of Disruption-as-Solely-the-Province-of-Neo-Liberal-Discourse and the Education-is-not-broken-at-all poles the discussion seems to be falling into these days (and apologies for picking on Martin, I’m just too tired to dig out a better
straw man example of the latter argument.) Because I think there is a third (and fourth and fifth and…) possibility here, that
- there are lots of pieces of education that don’t work very well but
- there are some pieces that do and
- there are values and people involved with educational institutions that shouldn’t just be chucked away in the pursuit of economic efficiencies but
- the network is indeed a disruptive force, and
- that disruption will not simply lead to some techno-utopian ideal and
- commercial forces will use it to continue the march of globalization towards an uninhabitable planet filled with alienated, over-medicated people unless
- we start to change many of our relations, along many vectors, and not just rearrange deckchairs.
But that doesn’t fit well on a t-shirt. Plus even those who think it maybe sounds like a good idea in theory don’t think it’s actually possible any longer, if it ever was, so we might as well shut up and enjoy the ride while it lasts.
Anyways, I’m not going to write that post. I (hope I) WILL keep working in “education” and “learning” in ways that embody the changes I think we need to bring about, which likely mean lots of beans and rice in my future, cause its a future where we stop living on borrowed time. But I’m growing weary of trying to convince anyone else. This talk was meant to simply offer some small examples of ways we can implement technology that both harness the liberating power of the network but also make small steps towards changing how universities relate to what’s outside their walls. These changes in and of themselves are insufficient. But they start to position institutions differently, in a way I think will serve them well in the battles to come (if they happen at all; I’m not so naive to think these aren’t rearguard battles, and despite a disdain for the language of warfare, make no mistakes, there are sides to choose.)
Anyways, the slides are below and the full text of the speech of the talk is available here (sorry, no recording.)
And I can’t help leaving you with this clip from Animal House, which comes to mind every time I hear another person downplay the enormity of the challenges facing us