• Home
  • About
  • Presentations
  • Projects
  • C.V.
Browse: Home / The Rest / Open Textbooks Questions – Part Deux

Open Textbooks Questions – Part Deux

By sleslie on February 25, 2010

Sincere thanks to everyone who took the time last week to offer up their ideas on their favourite Open Textbook example. You can see all the submissions to the Google form so far.

In conversation with some esteemed peers this week, though, it became clear that there are multiple ways to approach this issue, not just ‘what are the best open textbooks’ but also ‘in which courses would a quality open textbook have the biggest impact?’

So for folks here in BC – what course(s) in your institution would an open textbook have the biggest impact on? This might be the highest enrollment course, meaning savings for the largest number of people, but it might also be the course with an inordinately expensive text, or one with both an expesnive text and room for quality improvements. Please let me know in the comments below. We’ll definitely be looking into this same issue at the system-wide level in BC, but I am interested to hear from specific people/institutions where they think the highest impact might be. – SWL

Posted in The Rest

One response to “Open Textbooks Questions – Part Deux”

  1. Gina
    Gina
    March 2, 2010 at 9:48 am | Permalink | Reply

    ABE textbooks come to mind. The textbooks may not be inordinately expensive by some standards but they sure are expensive for most learners who sign up for upgrading courses. I talked about the possibility of collaborating for the development of an open textbook for ABE math with our ABE folks the other day. They reminded me that ‘we tried this once’ many years ago & the result was very disappointing so we may have a bit of a job to educate people about value, quality, choice & other good things that they want to see in a textbook.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

« Previous Next »

Technologies for Learning, Thinking and Collaborating

Search

Tags

authoring BCcampus blogs CMS conference constrained-search copyright Creative-Commons dickheads Edutools elearning2.0 evaluation firefox google humour IMS interoperability learning-design Learning Objects library lms loosely-coupled loosely-coupled-teaching LOR mashup mashups Moodle music network-learning northern-voice OER OLNet open-education open-textbooks open_source PLE presentations reusability RSS SCORM sharing social_learning standards twitter wordpress

Recent Comments

  • Keith Webster on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 2 – WordPress and Pressbooks
  • admin on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 2 – WordPress and Pressbooks
  • Notes from the web: OER platforms and news « kavubob's miscellanea on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki
  • Notes from the web: OER platforms and news « kavubob's miscellanea on The Moving Target of Open “Textbooks”
  • OTR Links 02/07/2012 | doug – off the record on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki

Archives



My Favourite Reads

  • Abject Learning
  • Bavatuesdays
  • Clint Lalonde
  • CogDogBlog
  • D'Arcy Norman
  • David Kernohan
  • eLiterate
  • Flexknowlogy
  • FreeLearning
  • Gardner Writes
  • iterating towards openness
  • Joss Winn
  • Leigh Blackall
  • Mike Caulfield
  • Nancy White
  • Network Effects
  • OLDaily
  • OUseful
  • Ruminate
  • The EdTechie

SaveOurNet





Creative Commons License
Edtechpost by Scott Leslie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.
Cite

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org