Comments on: Improving on the Collection of PLE Diagrams

By: Debra Biser

Debra Biser — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:00:43 +0000

Scott – Don’t touch it! That is unless you’re going to add to it (apparently you have a right to be scared). I work in Academic Technology and this semester took my first class in many-a-year. My instructor asked us to 1) create a PLE, and 2) reflect on what a PLE is. Your collection really helped me gel the idea that a PLE is not a set “thing” and is highly customizable to the individual (hence the “personal” in PLE). I got a chuckle out of some of the diagrams, D’Arcy Norman’s in particular. I posted a link to your collection and got a short response from the instructor thanking me for sharing. Your list was truly valuable to me as both in my role as a student and as a technologist. Many thanks to you for it!

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:20:25 +0000

George, it is really gratifying to hear it is being made use of. If you can think of a way to organize it differently that would work better for your learners, or indeed an activity in which they could improve on it, I am all ears. And like I said, I’m very open to it living somewhere else if that means it is seen as more of a public resource and thus hopefully more open to reuse/remixing by others.

By: George Siemens

George Siemens — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:00:43 +0000

Hi Scott – I use your list regularly…a key assignment in the Intro to Emerging Tech course at U of Manitoba requires learners to review the list and then select those diagrams that they find valuable.

It’s a terrific resource, Scott. Thanks for making it available…

George

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:10:11 +0000

Ismael, you are right – I did try to tease out a little of this by grouping the diagrams into different orientations (“Tool” “Use/Action,” “People”) but more could be done for sure. This was partly what prompted this email – as the collection gets to a certain size, it becomes cumbersome, and depending on how people are using it (and what they themselves might be willing to help with) there are different ways to re-do it that might incorporate a more folksonomic approach or at least involve more people’s perspectives/needs. At the end of the day, if no one else comes forward, that’s fine, I may or may not keep moving forward with it (I tend to not focus on one single area/approach for too long) – this was an attempt to engage in conversation to see if it was worthwhile and see if there were co-conspirators. Anyways, appreciate your feedback and glad that it is of some use/interest. Cheers, Scott

By: ismael peña-lópez

ismael peña-lópez — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:45:14 +0000

“What would make it better?”

It would be great that you took the 50 models, put them “one on top of the other” (as if you printed them on acetate transparent paper), discover what parts overlap again and again, and try to write a great blog post about what are the common issues you found that constitute what we could call the “core” of “any” PLE.

Yes, I can do that myself, but you surely know them much better than anyone.

And… errr… well, you just volunteered by putting the question, didn’t you?

BTW, thanks for the compilation. Yes, it’s useful: I suscribed long ago to the RSS feed