• Home
  • About
  • Presentations
  • Projects
  • C.V.
Browse: Home / The Rest / MegaTrends in E-Learning Provision

MegaTrends in E-Learning Provision

By sleslie on February 5, 2008

http://nettskolen.nki.no/in_english/megatrends/

Via the sporadic but often interesting e-learning reviews site comes a note about this large-scale study of, well, large-scale European e-learning providers (or “megaproviders” as the report calls them.)

Of most interest is perhaps the “Analyses of European megaproviders of e-learning” and the “Recommendations for robust and sustainable large-scale e-learning”.

Me, I’m not so sure I’m even keen on the notion of “megaproviders” any more, if I ever was. Some of the recommendations seem a bit obvious (“Recommendation 13: Robust, sustainable and large-scale e-learning initiatives should make sure to receive support from their top management” – uh huh) while others (“Recommendation 6: Use standard and widely-used technologies; widely-used technologies enable students to apply the software and hardware they have at their
disposal with little need to buy and install additional equipment.”) don’t seem to me to go far enough in decrying errors we continue to make.

Still, the report authors and funders are to be commended for having the courage to examine the host of failed projects to date and try to learn from these. There is a lot of material here and much good stuff to be digested over the next week as I dig through it. Enjoy! – SWL

Posted in The Rest | Tagged elearning, failure, megaproviders

No responses to “MegaTrends in E-Learning Provision”

  1. 益学会 > OLDaily 中文版 » Blog Archive » 2008年2月7日:电子学习举措,转Blac圈游戏,数据公民身份,抵制加密学术期刊,孔子遇到Web2.0
    益学会 > OLDaily 中文版 » Blog Archive » 2008年2月7日:电子学习举措,转Blac圈游戏,数据公民身份,抵制加密学术期刊,孔子遇到Web2.0
    February 8, 2008 at 5:30 am | Permalink

    [...] 未达到目标的电子学习举措 这只是书评,不过我非常喜欢它的观点。话虽如此,我倒不是很同意该书作者的分析。回顾失败的例子很好,但是是否研究过示例的范围是否。比如,他们说,“实际的市场研究是任何电子学习举措所必须的。”嗯,这个其实取决于你对成功的定义。比如,我认为这份简报就取得了广泛胜利。但是我之前并没有进行任何市场调查(这想法令我讨厌)。还有一个,“课程选择和认证非常关键。”我们想知道到底该不该选择课程。相关内容:Scott Leslie, 电子学习大趋势。Review by Ingrid Schonwald, elearning reviews February 7, 2008 [Link] [Tags: Newsletters, Online Learning, Books, Research] [Comment] [...]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

« Previous Next »

Technologies for Learning, Thinking and Collaborating

Search

Tags

authoring BCcampus blogs CMS conference constrained-search copyright Creative-Commons dickheads Edutools elearning2.0 evaluation firefox google humour IMS interoperability learning-design Learning Objects library lms loosely-coupled loosely-coupled-teaching LOR mashup mashups Moodle music network-learning northern-voice OER OLNet open-education open-textbooks open_source PLE presentations reusability RSS SCORM sharing social_learning standards twitter wordpress

Recent Comments

  • Wayne Mackintosh on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki
  • Scott M on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki
  • Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki on The Moving Target of Open “Textbooks”
  • sleslie on The Moving Target of Open “Textbooks”
  • dkernohan on The Moving Target of Open “Textbooks”

Archives



My Favourite Reads

  • Abject Learning
  • Bavatuesdays
  • Clint Lalonde
  • CogDogBlog
  • D'Arcy Norman
  • David Kernohan
  • eLiterate
  • Flexknowlogy
  • FreeLearning
  • Gardner Writes
  • iterating towards openness
  • Joss Winn
  • Leigh Blackall
  • Mike Caulfield
  • Nancy White
  • Network Effects
  • OLDaily
  • OUseful
  • Ruminate
  • The EdTechie

SaveOurNet





Creative Commons License
Edtechpost by Scott Leslie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.
Cite

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org