<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On &quot;The Perils of Stargazing&quot; and the NMC Horizon Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/</link>
	<description>Technologies for Learning, Thinking and Collaborating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, yeah, I had the same thought. I didn&#039;t do it as a formal exercise, but I did go over the last 4 years reports, and my impression was that as the timeframe increaed (from 1 year to 5 years), the accuracy of the speculation generally lessened (kind of obviously). But what&#039;s more interesting, I think, is to look at the progress over the 4 years. The first year, 2004 - Learning Objects, Scalable Vector Graphics, Rapid Prototyping, Multimodal Interfaces, Context-Aware Computing and Knowledge Webs? Even the language belies how &#039;buzzy&#039; some of these were and I think in comparison, this year&#039;s is much more based on probable futures. I also like the fact that each year they&#039;ve produced a &quot;Where are they now?&quot; section (cf. http://www.nmc.org/horizon/wiki/Where_Are_They_Now_2006) looking back at last year&#039;s predicitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, yeah, I had the same thought. I didn&#8217;t do it as a formal exercise, but I did go over the last 4 years reports, and my impression was that as the timeframe increaed (from 1 year to 5 years), the accuracy of the speculation generally lessened (kind of obviously). But what&#8217;s more interesting, I think, is to look at the progress over the 4 years. The first year, 2004 &#8211; Learning Objects, Scalable Vector Graphics, Rapid Prototyping, Multimodal Interfaces, Context-Aware Computing and Knowledge Webs? Even the language belies how &#8216;buzzy&#8217; some of these were and I think in comparison, this year&#8217;s is much more based on probable futures. I also like the fact that each year they&#8217;ve produced a &#8220;Where are they now?&#8221; section (cf. <a href="http://www.nmc.org/horizon/wiki/Where_Are_They_Now_2006)" rel="nofollow">http://www.nmc.org/horizon/wiki/Where_Are_They_Now_2006)</a> looking back at last year&#8217;s predicitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edtechpost.ca/wordpress/2007/01/23/on-the-perils-of-stargazing-and-the-nmc-horizon-report/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>One of projects that I&#039;ve never gotten around to doing is to take the whole pile of horizon reports and see what they got right and what they got wrong. They&#039;ve started this process a bit on their wiki, but it does seem to be a useful exercise to regularly poke at predictions to figure out why they didn&#039;t quite work out as we thought they might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of projects that I&#8217;ve never gotten around to doing is to take the whole pile of horizon reports and see what they got right and what they got wrong. They&#8217;ve started this process a bit on their wiki, but it does seem to be a useful exercise to regularly poke at predictions to figure out why they didn&#8217;t quite work out as we thought they might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 237/240 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via www.edtechpost.ca

Served from: www.edtechpost.ca @ 2012-02-09 01:37:05 -->
