• Home
  • About
  • Presentations
  • Projects
  • C.V.
Browse: Home / Uncategorized / Educause Quarterly Article: Changing Course Management Systems

Educause Quarterly Article: Changing Course Management Systems

By sleslie on May 13, 2005

http://www.educause.edu/apps/eq/eqm05/eqm05210.asp

This is one of those articles that ranks in the “could have been important but ends up being too anecdotal” category. The authors are right in pointing to course conversion as both a potential cost issue and huge concern in switching CMS. All one has to do is ask a collection of system administrators or educational technologists who support almost any of the major CMS and they will nod knowingly, or start frothing at the mouth (depending on whether they’ve actually had to do it en masse or not).

But this is one area where higher ed suffers greatly from diverging from the corporate training world – we have no equivalent to an ADL to provide certification of these products on IMS Content Packaging (the larger scoped SCORM never having taken off within higher ed, for good reason.) So we are left to rely on the self-reporting of the CMS companies about their compliance with the Content Packaging and QTI schemes.

For a while the story that the churn of these specifications was what caused the lack of consistent implementations seemed plausible, but increasingly, less and less so. And fair or not, it’s no small part of the reason why on the LOR front, people are increasingly resistant to the notion of trusting their content to the big CMS vendors, as they have yet to exhibit content exports from their systems that will work well in their competitors’ systems.

The irony of this article is that D2L, one of the 2 companies mentioned here, has in fact done a lot of work to be able to convert content from their competitors’ systems as part of their business growth strategy. So if this is the case in trying to convert to them, one can only wonder what it might look like going betwen some of the others. IMS CP got started as a spec shortly after the formation of IMS in 1997, and was an early goal for good reason. From the customers’ perspective, it represented a major risk mitigation strategy to adopting one of these large systems (at a time when arguably the entire domain space was still in a very nascent state). 8 years later, one has got to ask, has it worked? Has the risk been mitigated? Ask your CMS admins and content developers, I’m sure they will tell you what they think. – SWL

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged CMS, D2L, IMS

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

« Previous Next »

Technologies for Learning, Thinking and Collaborating

Search

Tags

authoring BCcampus blogs CMS conference constrained-search copyright Creative-Commons dickheads Edutools elearning2.0 evaluation firefox google humour IMS interoperability learning-design Learning Objects library lms loosely-coupled loosely-coupled-teaching LOR mashup mashups Moodle music network-learning northern-voice OER OLNet open-education open-textbooks open_source PLE presentations reusability RSS SCORM sharing social_learning standards twitter wordpress

Recent Comments

  • adam hyde on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 2 – WordPress and Pressbooks
  • Keith Webster on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 2 – WordPress and Pressbooks
  • admin on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 2 – WordPress and Pressbooks
  • Notes from the web: OER platforms and news « kavubob's miscellanea on Open Textbook Authoring Tools Part 1 – Mediawiki
  • Notes from the web: OER platforms and news « kavubob's miscellanea on The Moving Target of Open “Textbooks”

Archives



My Favourite Reads

  • Abject Learning
  • Bavatuesdays
  • Clint Lalonde
  • CogDogBlog
  • D'Arcy Norman
  • David Kernohan
  • eLiterate
  • Flexknowlogy
  • FreeLearning
  • Gardner Writes
  • iterating towards openness
  • Joss Winn
  • Leigh Blackall
  • Mike Caulfield
  • Nancy White
  • Network Effects
  • OLDaily
  • OUseful
  • Ruminate
  • The EdTechie

SaveOurNet





Creative Commons License
Edtechpost by Scott Leslie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License.
Cite

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org