Calum’s rugby practice this morning afforded me the joy of a full hour and a half’s reading. I find I cannot open Ulysses unless I know I have at least 30 minutes straight to immerse myself in it, so this was particularly welcome.
Reading the Bloom sections, I quickly remembered why as a younger reader I had seen Bloom to be a character of some ridicule; the Calypso and Lotus Eater sections have a number of bits where he fantasizes about different women and it was easy to read this as somehow a flaw and Joyce as somehow critical. Similarly, his awkwardness in a few of the exchanges (especially his fumbled anti-semetic joke in the carriag, p.99) are easy to take as his short-comings.
What a difference 15 years and a lot of living makes, and the things my own life experience now help me notice. I think I had previously clued in that Molly and Bloom had lost a son together (Rudy), but having lost a child of my own, I understand now what a character shaping event that can be. I can now understand his reflections on his lost son in the Hades episode as not just another blip in his stream of consciousness. And again I was shocked by a massive detail of Bloom’s life I had previously elided in my reading - his father had (or at least was suspected of having) killed himself (p.101).
It is easy to miss these details (as I had) as they are inserted into other more mundane observations of his surroundings. And yet, having now noticed them, I find my ability to believe in Bloom as a full existential character, not simply the amalgam of symbols or the construct of style I once saw him as, is thoroughly stengthened. Once again, the style and difficulty of the text is falling away for me and what remains is the visceral existences of these characters.
And if I had any doubt that Joyce has sympathy for Bloom, it is erased in the one line comment about eunuchs (p. 86 in my Minerva 1992 text):
“Who knows? Eunuchs. One way out of it.”
On the one hand, this is laugh-out-loud funny. But it also shows Bloom as not at all oblivious to his own skirt-chasing behaviour, nor the deeper sadness and emptiness that this tries (failingly) to fill.
Maybe I should rename this blog to “Discovering Scott Leslie.”