« How to Use this Site | Main | Welcome to the ETUG Blogtalk! »

Monday, October 06, 2003

What are weblogs, anyway?

You may have encountered some of the breathless pieces hailing weblogs for their revolutionary impact in fields such as publishing, journalism, politics, and education. Some zealots go so far as to suggest that weblogs herald fundamental shifts in social organization and the way we work. The resulting backlash to such hype has already kicked in, with critics charging that these claims are radically overblown, that weblogs are ill-suited for many of their purported applications, and that they have already peaked as a web phenomenon.

You'll be reading variations on both positions over the next couple of weeks, but of course the true significance of weblogs lies somewhere in between. The technical elements of weblog software are far from revolutionary -- they are really just easily updated webpages. But it is precisely that simplicity that makes them so interesting. Even if some new form renders weblogs as this year's equivalent of the pet rock, being able to publish to the web without sophisticated geek skills remains an important advance for online users.

And there's no question about their rapidly growing popularity. The following statistics from Technorati, a weblog index:


Technorati is now tracking over one million weblogs. We hit 100,000 back on March 5, and 200,000 on April 6; We hit the 400,000 mark on June 21. Technorati is currently tracking about 7,000 new weblogs per day, which means that a new weblog is being created approximately every 12 seconds. And I know we're not catching them all.... [from Sifry's Alerts]

It's impossible in a short space to review all the potential applications of the form. Personally speaking, my own weblog serves numerous purposes for me:

* I use it as a personal management tool, collecting useful resources and links in an easily accessible and searchable online location.
* I treat it as something like a public brain, floating ideas, speculating on future developments, giving shout-outs to work that I like and shooting off ill-tempered criticisms to things that I don't.
* It's an ongoing personal portfolio, where I archive my articles, presentations and project updates.
* Perhaps most importantly, my weblog has been my interface to a vibrant group of professional peers. They provide me with a steady stream of useful resources and information, feedback on my work, and the sense of belonging to a very real (if unstructured and far from unified) community.

But the diverse approaches to weblogging are best experienced for yourself. A handful of my personal favorites:

wood s lot: frighteningly prolific and eclectic, with minimal commentary.
Cassandra Pages: the weblog as online diary and space for personal reflection.
Fotolog: an amazing collection of photographic weblogs from around the world. An extremely effective time-waster.
Ongoing: Tim Bray's site is intended to be "a coherent, catalogued essay about the world" organizaed around the "unifying themes are Truth, Technology, and Business."
Boing Boing: "a directory of wonderful things."
Arts & Letters Daily: comprehensive page supported by the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Feel free to recommend your own favorite weblogs by linking to them in the comments field below. We also encourage you to contribute your thoughts on any of the following questions:

What has been your experience with weblogs (either as a reader or as a creator)? What is it about weblogs that you most want to discuss? Have you considered starting your own, and if so what do you need to know to get going?

Thanks to ETUG for organizing this discussion, and thanks to you for checking in. We hope this rather unconventionial online happening proves to be an interesting and useful experience for everyone concerned.

Posted by Brian Lamb at 07:30 AM in Introduction to Weblogs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/184082

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What are weblogs, anyway?:

Comments

As a testament to 'ease of use' - the site you are looking at now took under 10 minutes to set up as a rough shell, and less than a few hours to set up fully. Now that it has been set up, posting to it is as simple as filling in a web-based form like the one you use to submit comments. All of this on what was for me brand-new software that I hadn't used before.

There is definitely a wide variety of blogging packages covering the spectrum of easy to difficult to use, and this package has its own issue, but more on that later...

Posted by: Scott Leslie at October 6, 2003 09:40 AM

I was first introduced to blogging by my buddy Dave Smulders, who edits SideBars with Maggie Beers and I. We use a blog to talk about issues, links etc. that we might include in upcoming issues of the e-zine, although its usually Dave that does most of the posting.

To me, the THING about blogs as a form of communication, is their de-centralized nature. A single discussion may be distributed across several different blogs.

Perhaps a useful analogy would be to think about blogs as a kind of electronic grapevine. A bulletin board is more like a meeting. The entire discussion takes place in one spot, and you can see what everyone said. Blogging, on the other hand, is more like the decentralized discussion that often goes on after the meeting is over. You go for coffee with your best friends, and you re-hash what when on at the meeting. The bulletin board discussion is probably more democratic since everyone has an equal opportunity to contribute. But the blogging discussion is probably more frank, because its your soap box. Any thoughts...

Thanks Scott for hosting this.

Cheers, Glenn.

Posted by: glenn millar at October 6, 2003 10:16 AM

Hello,

My name is Colin Brittain, I am a student at SFU Surrey (formerly TechBC) and am also employed by SFU working in the field of online communities.

I have used (and read) blogs in the past for personal reasons, but at present am exploring their use in an academic setting. My goal is to integrate blogging into online communities; making it much easier to dynamically update content on the go. Because of the ease of use of most blogging tools, I feel that it can be easily used by "non-technical" individuals.

It seems that blogging is slowly being introduced into the academic world, but it is a slow transition. I would like to know what others feel are the most important issues to address when presenting information in an academic setting, to a wide audience, via blogging. I'd also love to hear about anyone who is using blogging in academics.

I'm looking forward to the rest of the discussion.

Cheers,

Colin Brittain
cmbritta@sfu.ca

Posted by: Colin Brittain at October 6, 2003 10:37 AM

I've been reading and thinking about RSS and Blogs for education, trying to learn the hows of it, creating my own list of links to information about RSS, Blogs and Wikis. I downloaded and am trying out a blogger app (Google's Blogger.com) and an RSS aggregator (BlogExpress).

I think I'm beginning to "get it", but it's not as easy as regular bloggers make out. Getting the concept was the first learning curve; after that it's understanding what makes it all happen, followed by decisions about applications to use.

Finally, accepting the whole thing is a real hurdle. I'm active online, so that's not the issue. I don't mind innovative approaches to course content, so that's not the issue. All in all, I still can't get past thinking of blogs as personal diary entries, and time-consuming to keep up with let alone post to. As articles build up in my aggregator, I begin to feel overwhelmed, and that's only with two feeds coming in. I can see the use for a course, where the blog is focussed and will end at a foreseeable time. But in daily life I'm feeling that participation in blogs is just one more time consumer, low on the priority list. How to fit all this in to a typical teacher's day is the question.

Posted by: Kate Britt at October 6, 2003 11:14 AM

I confess to having had a blog epiphany, and contributing to the hype by exalting blogs publicly. http://www.bctechnology.com/statics/pstacey-jul2503.html

Having seen the light I've been experimenting with the form factor of blogging without actually settling in to any one style - a kind of play I think of as "blog improv".

The continuous daily diary format of many blogs seems to create an obligation for bloggers to post even when there is little to say. This creates a sifting challenge requiring readers to process volumes for nuggets.

I know how much work I've put in to writing an E-Learning column every month for the last three years and I'm not sure I want to write every day so I've been exploring event based blogging rather than a continuous diary.

In September I "Blogged Merlot" (the four day long Multimedia Educational Resources for Learning and Online Teaching conference in Vancouver) by posting coverage and analysis of keynotes, sessions and events happening live.

I blogged Merlot using a discussion forum inside an online community (LearningTimes http://www.learningtimes.org).

While getting blasted by some for blogging behind a login screen, I found blogging inside a community allowed me to extend the blog with audio, photos, discussion, polling, voice chat, text messaging, and meeting rooms. In addition to text blogging I used voice-over-IP applications in the community to actually "talk" live online with people in Australia, Iceland, and Denmark who were interested in Merlot but unable to attend.

Having done a solo text based blog I became interested in the potential of group blogging an event using an audio voice board rather than text. This led me to setup and try "audio blogging" Online Learning 2003 in L.A.

In the tradition of old time radio and live on the scene reporting, myself and one other attendee at Online Learning 2003 posted daily sound bites covering the event to a Wimba voice board inside LearningTimes. The voice board format gives community members the ability to listen to postings and add their own comments or ask questions.

I think blogging is a powerful form of story telling and revelation. I'm interested in other accounts of blogging form factor experimentation. What aspects of blogging's form factor are essential? When does a blog cease to become a blog?

Anyone else got a blog improv story to share?

Paul

Posted by: Paul Stacey at October 6, 2003 11:44 AM

Glenn, I really like your comment about the conversation in blogs being like an "electronic grapevine" - you're exactly right, it is different than a threaded discussion and different than a mailing list, and these differences are both one of its strengths and one of its weaknesses.

We struggled with this issue in thinking about how to host this discussion - right off the bat it seemed to everyone that having this discussion in the mailing list, where we were just talking 'about' blogs but not using them, wasn't the way to go. We wanted people to really experience them. But the challenge is that they aren't necessarily the perfect mechanism for hosting a 'conversation' or what happens on a mailing list. They start to look more conversational when you combine the act of reading other blogs (especially a group who read each others) with the act of writing one, but apart from direct interaction in comments fields the conversation is always slightly tangential.

What this means to me is that, as you say, with blogs "it's your soap box" and so there's more of a sense of individual voices rather than group conversations. One positive effect of this, though, is less of the phenomenom found in the old usenet groups of 'flaming,' and also less ability for any one individual to dominate any one 'conversation.'

Hopefully more of the attributes will become apparent as we go along, as I think they definitely affect the kinds of uses blogs should and should not be put to.

Posted by: Scott Leslie at October 6, 2003 12:08 PM

Following the invitation to participate in this discussion on blogs, I feel as if I've been dumped into a conversation in mid-hurl. This site seems quite - busy, frenetic, and gang-busterish, rather like coming in the kitchen door to a party and discovering everyone in the pool already. Typing my comments, for example, is quite unnerving, because I'm looking at about four words as they scroll past.
so ... count me very interested and intrigued, but busy and perhaps not willing to put the time in at this moment to get on blog, so to spea

Posted by: Wendy Burton at October 6, 2003 12:42 PM

Delighted to see the conversation off to a quick start. And don't feel unnerved--we're all quite harmless!

I share people's hesitation about education blogging as a time sink. I'm trying out course blogs with my students at Cap College this fall, so far with very little student feedback. (You can see one such blog at http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/trecs/ )

But one student today asked if it would be possible to post directly to that blog, instead of simply adding comments to my posts. I said I'd be happy to give author status to any student who wants it.

Not all will, just as not all students speak up in class. But students who can contribute to the blog are more likely to feel engaged in using the blog to advance and enhance their education. Or so I sincerely hope.

Posted by: Crawford Kilian at October 6, 2003 09:31 PM

I'm loving this discussion in this format. Thanks for organizing this!

I've been struggling to find a metaphor to describe blogs. To me it's refreshing to get away from that layered feeling of some discussion tools. This has more of a sideways feeling. It's like I'm bouncing around to different huddles during a conference coffee break or something, rather than peeling away layers of interface trying to get at the little tidbit I want to read.

I'm sure most of you are familiar with Stephen Downes and the work he does over at
http://www.downes.ca

He lists reasons for using the tools and format on "Stephen's Web" at http://www.downes.ca/about.htm
This list nicely sums up the value of blogging in online learning.

Sylvia

Posted by: Sylvia Currie at October 8, 2003 09:29 AM

Post a comment